Dec 24,  · For $ after coupon – Capture One Pro Fujifilm 12 Perpetual license with 3 Style Packs: Cinematic Styles; Film Styles; Black & white Styles; For $ after coupon – Capture One Pro Fujifilm 12 Perpetual license without Style Packs. I’m new to Fujifilm and have limited experience working with raw files. I would appreciate your feedback on each. Jun 03,  · This is the free cut-down version of Capture One designed for users of cameras from specific manufacturers. If is available for Nikon, Sony and Fujifilm users. It contains a subset of the “Pro” version of Capture One. It does have the core RAW conversion features and basic editing features but it lacks a lot of the more advanced editing. Capture One FUJIFILM. Award-winning image editing software Capture One is developed with the ambition of enabling creatives to achieve their vision. Through a smooth, efficient workflow Capture One is the professional’s choice in imaging software. Capture One FUJIFILM brings custom camera support exclusively for FUJIFILM.
 
 

Capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free

 

Thomas is a professional fine art photographer and writer specialising in photography related instructional books as well as travel writing and street photography. On top of that there are subscription options and perpetual licences.

I get a lot of questions about some of these versions, and so, in this post I will attempt to break down the differences fujifklm offer advice on which version you should get. This is the free cut-down version of Capture One designed for users of cameras from specific manufacturers. If is available for NikonSony and Fujifilm users. It does have the core RAW conversion features and basic editing features but it lacks a lot of the more advanced editing tools, such as Capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free, Luma Curve, Process Recipes and so on.

As well as the limited features, you can also only open RAW files from the specific version. For a full feature comparison of what is in the pro and express versions, there is a detailed breakdown on the Capture One website. If you only shoot with one brand of camera, and if that brand is Nikon, Fuji or Sony, and you only want basic features, then you should consider the express version of Capture One. You can also consider this as a way to start with the platform, and you can always step up to the other versions later.

Capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free is the full featured version of Capture One, but limited by camera brand. In other words, if you have the Nikon version, it will only open Nikon raw files.

The advantage of this is that it is a god bit cheaper on the full version. Sorry Canon! Va you get one of these, you will only be able to open RAW files from the corresponding brand of camera, but you should be able to open Jpeg and Tiff files from any brand. The difference in price is quite substantial.

If you only shoot with one frree of camera, and capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free brand is a Sony, Fujifilm or Nikon, then you should consider this version. It will be quite a bit cheaper than the full vvs, but you will be limited to using raw files from the brand of camera corresponding to the version you bought. If you shoot with more than one brand of camera then you should look at the full version instead. The main version of Capture One is Capture One pro. You can use it with any supported camera which includes a wide range of cameras, not just the brands available as specific versionsboth for RAW files and for RGB files such as Перейти на страницу and Jpeg.

One of the things that I often see that confuses some new users, is whether or not the manufacturer versions Sony, Fuji, Nikon have any advantages over Capture One Pro for all cameras. For examples, if you shoot Fujifilm, the film simulation profiles are included with both the Fujifilm version and the full version. There are no disadvantages of getting the full version over the brand specific versions. If you shoot with multiple cameras fkjifilm different brands, or if you shoot Canon, Panasonic or other brands not included in the specific versions above then Capture One pro for any camera is the version you should choose.

Capture One is available as a full, perpetual license or a Capfure. IF you buy the full licence, you generally get all point upgrades captue, but you have to pay to upgrade to major new versions. For example, most recently, if you bought version 12, you got all of the upgrades to 12 The brand versions are cheaper. If you have the subscription version, you pay a monthly or annual fee, and you get all upgrades.

This way has a lower initial cost, especially if you choose the monthly version, however, you fre pay more in the long term after a few yearsand as with all subscriptions, if you stop paying, your version will be disabled when your term runs out. The perpetual version will keep working even if you choose not to upgrade to a specific version.

At the end of the day, capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free version you choose is up to you. I know some people simply hate subscriptions and so will always prefer perpetual licences.

Жмите сюда, much not be able to afford a large initial outlay, but can manage the lower monthly costs. If you want to help support our blog, capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free can do so if you buy anything from our affiliate partners:.

If you buy through the above links, we get a small commission, which helps run this site. Note that this post contains paid affiliate links. We get a small commission for purchases made through these links, which helps run this site. Photo Journal. Fuji X Series. Capture One. Street Photography. Buy Lightroom Prests. Buy eBooks. Subscribe to RSS. About Thomas Fitzgerald Thomas is a professional fine art photographer and writer specialising in photography related instructional books as well as travel writing and street photography.

Jun 3. Thomas Fitzgerald. Who should get this? If перейти shoot with more than one brand of camera, or you need more than just basic features. Who should get this источник статьи Perpetual licence or Subscription Capture One is available as a full, perpetual license or a Subscription.

Help Support the Blog Buy from our affiliates If you want to help support our blog, you can do so if you buy anything from our affiliate partners: Capture One Pro is available in both subscription and perpetual licences available, in versions for all camerasFuji specificSony specific or Nikon specific. Приведенная ссылка AI is available from Skylum Software.

Buy me a coffee! Leave a comment.

 

Capture One Fujifilm Express and Pro. What to Choose for Fuji Photographer?

 

Over the past few download free microsoft trial project 2013 download standard, I’ve been comparing the editing tools provided for free with your digital camera purchase with the pound, subscription-ware gorilla in lro room, Adobe Camera Raw, to see if it’s really necessary to pay for software when you’re on a tight budget.

Fujifilm’s customers have several different choices of software available with the purchase of their camera. Note that there’s also a similarly named and also Fuji-specific version called Capture One for Fujifilm, but since that’s payware it’s beyond the scope of this piece. Let’s roll up our sleeves and find out.

This article is based upon the most recent versions of each application at the time of writing. For Adobe, that’s Camera Raw I’ve chosen to use images from the Fujifilm X-T3.

It’s been available long enough for processing to be optimized, and its launch price and resolution are broadly similar to those of the cameras used in my previous manufacturer obe comparisons.

To ensure neither Adobe nor Fujifilm had any advantage pfo of the gate, I’ve aimed to reproduce, as closely as possible, the look of already-processed images from our gallerywithout any prior knowledge as to the recipes behind them. Sharpness and noise capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free were left at their default settings to avoid overcomplicating things, while lens corrections were enabled for both applications.

For Capture One, I used quality level 96 fuujifilm yielded approximately the same file sizes. The most significant difference between Capture One and Adobe’s offerings are in their pricing and camera support. Capture One Express Fujifilm is completely free of charge, but it only supports Fuji-branded cameras.

Although it can import photos from other cameras, it won’t let you edit or export them. While it’s offered free, you do need to supply an email address and can only get a single-install license for each email address you give.

So if, say, you want to edit both on a desktop and laptop, you’ll need to supply multiple email addresses. It also has a pared-down feature setlacking many more pro-oriented editing, capture, fujiffilm and export tools that are available in the coreldraw x8 graphics 2018 number free version of Capture One. But it still includes the basic tools most photographers are likely to need. But Adobe’s apps will support Raw files from close to different cameras, smartphones, drones and more, and you’ll also get the combined feature-set of Lightroom, Lightroom Classic and Photoshop, which together can do far more than even the full version of Capture One.

Another advantage typical of manufacturer software is quicker and more in-depth support for new camera models, as well as a closer match for the look of images processed in-camera.

But with Capture One actually being developed by a third party, that’s not necessarily as true as it is for most manufacturer software. It’s worth noting, for example, that Fujifilm has a long relationship with the developer of Silkypix. Support for those cameras captrue Capture One arrived on frfe same day both models shipped, however. So perhaps the link with Capture One is closer, or the Capture One team is just quicker bearing in mind that neither the X-E4 nor GFX S uses a new sensor, which theoretically makes adding support a relatively trivial matter.

As for the look of images, Fujifilm promises it will deliver ” unmatched straight-from-camera color accuracy “. But as we’ll see in a bit, that doesn’t tell the whole story. Capture One Express Fujifilm has a clean, modern-looking non-modal interface with a fixed toolbar at the top of the screen, as well as panels for both thumbnail browsing and all other tools. The tool panel can be place on the left or the right, and the thumbnail panel either at the bottom of the screen or on whichever side remains нажмите чтобы прочитать больше by the tool panel.

Atop the tool panel are buttons to access tabs grouping controls related to library control, filtering, metadata and keywording, and various groups of editing controls. There’s also a “Q” button that groups together duplicates capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free the controls you’re likely to need most often.

While you can’t add or remove tabs or individual controls in the Express version, you can still pin your favorites to the top of their particular tab for quicker access. You can also add more tools to the topmost toolbar, or rearrange its order.

I found the various controls on offer to be quite logically grouped and named, and easy to use. Windows UI paradigms are followed well, and you can either adjust sliders or cqpture in values directly. One very slight bug, though, is that the sliders seem to captire stored internally with a higher level of precision than numeric entry, with the result that two images with the same numeric value can nevertheless show slightly different positions for the same slider.

Your editing data is stored in an overall catalog file encompassing all of your imported images, and can also be written to XMP sidecar files in the same directories ohe the images themselves. This lets you choose which approach you prefer, while avoiding the riskier method captufe writing edits into the metadata of your original Raw files. One slight oddity if you also use Photoshop in your workflow is that Capture One also embeds battlefield bad company 1 download pc free metadata into its exported JPEG files, with the result that by default Photoshop opens them in Camera Raw, not directly into the main Photoshop workspace.

Multiple monitors aren’t supported in the Express version of Capture One, but high DPI screens are supported, as are both pen and touch-screen inputs. Setups with mixed-resolution displays can cause scaling issues, however.

Compared to most free, bundled software, Capture One Express turns in a very creditable result when capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free comes to performance. It still doesn’t manage to match Adobe Camera Raw in this respect — and Adobe has made another step forward in the time I’ve been writing this review — but it comes closer than has any other app I’ve yet tested.

In terms of its user interface, I found Capture One to be faster at browsing full images, while Adobe Camera Raw is a bit quicker when it came to viewing and previewing of edits. But the advantage for Adobe was only very slight here, and Capture One’s edit previews remain very close to real-time. The first time it’s started — and again when updated — it pops up a dialog stating that it’s “setting up hardware acceleration”.

Your computer remains responsive during this process, but until completed, it more than doubles rendering times. And even leaving the computer entirely idle doesn’t persuade Capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free One to speed up. It’s a minor issue, and one you thankfully don’t see too often, but it’s nevertheless a bit annoying if you’re in a rush when you do. I suggest disallowing upgrades if you’re on a deadline, for that reason. When it comes to final processing, Adobe has a bit more of an edge.

On my machine, Capture One Express Fujifilm requires ffree 20 seconds to process the six images used in this review, as compared to around 15 seconds to process the same images in Adobe Camera Por.

That doesn’t quite tell the whole story, though, as Captufe performance improved noticeably between version By way of contrast, most manufacturer software I’ve tested takes at least twice as long as Adobe, and sometimes much longer. In terms of their color rendering, both Capture One Express Fujifilm and Adobe Camera Raw are basically indistinguishable from each other or out-of-camera JPEGs, prior to making any adjustments to your image.

At least, for the Astia, Provia and Velvia film simulations. With that said, results differ quite a bit if you let either application automatically adjust your images.

Adobe gives you a single-button auto control, and tends to make bigger adjustments to exposure. It holds onto shadows and highlights significantly better, but also tends to oversaturate for a more consumer-friendly look. Its auto white balance tends to do a better job, and its other auto algorithms also tended to yield more realistic colors in general than did Adobe. I found that last point especially true for skin tones, foliage and blue skies. As you can see in my captre, Adobe’s skin tones has tended to make subjects look just slightly sickly, whereas Capture One’s skin tones are more lifelike.

And there was a capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free advantage in foliage and skies, which also look more natural with Capture One. Adobe’s algorithms also apply more sharpening by default, but can introduce slight but noticeable haloing.

Capture One doesn’t halo by default, but its results appear less crisp. Capture One’s default noise reduction levels are also a good bit higher than those of Adobe Camera Raw, particularly as Frew levels increase. The good news, though, is that I couldn’t see any noticeable loss of detail as a result. With absolutely no fuss beyond letting the automatic algorithms do their funifilm, Capture One consistently gave me significantly cleaner images. Given capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free smaller APS-C sensors still capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free by Fuji’s X-mount cameras in an increasingly full-frame world, that’s definitely great news!

Of course, both applications also allow noise reduction to be dialed back significantly from their defaults. As for lens corrections, neither application’s results was quite identical cappture those of in-camera JPEGs, but Adobe seems significantly closer than Capture One.

Results from the latter were mostly still fairly close, but occasionally differed quite noticeably. That was also true of vignetting correction, where Capture One sometimes made rather larger exposure corrections near the corners than did either Adobe or in-camera JPEGs.

Capture One also has an occasional tendency to crop images if distortion correction was enabled, even when its “hide distorted areas” setting was unchecked. With all of that said, both Adobe Camera Raw and Capture One offer a lot of scope for correction, and provide a good set of controls.

I’ve found Capture One to be a pretty good match for its Adobe rival, and it’s far more pleasing to use than any other free, manufacturer-provided software to date, making it quite easy to get the look I wanted with relatively little work. I have to admit, the capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free of my testing were a bit of a surprise. Given the relationship between Capture One and Fujifilm, and the fact that the latter actually offers the software for its own users, I expected its results to more closely mirror those of in-camera processing.

But in truth, it was generally Adobe that got closer to the in-camera results. Capture One suppresses noise much more so than Adobe does by default, but without losing any apparent detail. Colors from Adobe were generally good and matched the out-of-camera JPEGs better, but occasionally fujifil, my testing I found that skin tones could make people look a cxpture ill.

When it comes to the selection of controls on offer and their ease of use, both ACR and Capture One are pretty close. Some other differences are in their distortion correction autodesk autocad 2020 serial free auto adjustments. For distortion I think Adobe has a slight edge, but for auto adjustments I definitely ended up preferring Capture One over ACR’s more punchy, consumer-friendly look.

I was also impressed with Capture One’s performance. Sure, Adobe still rules the roost in this respect — and its most recent update looks to have taken another step forward — but it’s also payware software being pitted against a completely free alternative.

And Capture One gets far, far closer in terms of raw speed than any other bundled software I’ve yet tried. If cost is a primary concern for you and you don’t need to work with multiple camera brands, then I think it’s a no-brainer. Using Capture One Express Fujifilm could save you enough over the lifetime of your camera to buy a lens or accessory while still providing good speed, good image quality and a healthy selection of controls.

If you want the maximum possible performance, support for multiple camera brands or the extended features offered by Lightroom fujofilm Photoshop, though, then I think an Adobe Creative Cloud subscription remains your best bet. Images for this article were originally posted in this gallery.

Please do not reproduce any of these images without prior permission see our copyright page. C1 had excellent customer survive in my experience, I think that is ffee talking about in a review like this.

C1 seems to make lighter images which should not matter as capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free will be adjusted manually anywaybut geometric lens correction seem bad in C1 – images BULGE compared to LR. Maybe lens profiles function was not set correctly? Performance comparison was not very clearly presented; which one was more responsive?

Final render speed does not matter much compared to UI performance. I’m fed up with Adobe’s bloated offering and hogging of my PC’s resources. It took close to an hour to uninstall the Adobe crap on my pc and to be sure I was rid of it I used a registry cleaner to take care of the rest.

I mostly agree with the reviewer.

 
 

Capture one pro 12 vs capture one pro fujifilm free

 
 

Capture one is out of touch with reality, their pricing proves that. DxO photolab for me it is. Dropping C1! Panoramic function works better with free Microsoft I. I tested and was frustrated. I am strongly tempted to skip the this version. C1 v21 is fine with me. The good news is that C1 is so slow with adding features that it makes absolutely no difference if you are on a 3 or 4 generations old version. Capture One supports Sony’s embedded profiles, so new E-mount lenses are supported immediately.

Also, most people are not updating their cameras that regularly. So every 4 years a software update for the new camera would be totally fine. And if you are ok with some adjustments to your workflow you can use the most modern cameras in the oldest version of C1. Is there a way to default a particular lens to the embedded profile? Because I have a few that default to the wrong lens. Report it. I do have quite a few lenses that get misidentified by Capture One. Capture One will always apply their profiles first.

I generally prefer the lens manufacturer’s corrections. This made me upgrade. C22 has only buggy poorly implemented features in contrast.

They are just ICC profiles in the color profile folder. You could have downloaded the test version and copied the profiles into your old C1 version. Which is why I updated then. But using the profiles in v20 s still quite an improvement I can see sales falling off a cliff. First digital camera was a Minolta A1. A, A77 and now A7 IV. Before I got the A7 IV I did contemplate switching to a Nikon Z6 as I had no investment in E mount glass and had I done so I would have had to buy the unbranded version so I could edit both my recent Sony photos and what would have been the new Nikon photos and I doubt I would have paid to upgrade to unbranded.

That’s fair. I never understood why people went for the ‘branded’ version of Capture One is I myself have used several digital camerabrands over the past 20 years. And with that the brand locked version of Capture One wouldn’t cut it for me. They better start fixing the HDR and Panorama function. It doesn’t work as it should be. Too many artifacts with way too many images. Call yourself lucky if it works for you.

It doesn’t for me. I have the gut feeling they start to loose customers again, now that other RAW editor has masks and layers not being limited to 16 either Its a single feature that most of us don’t need. Its called collaboration work – How often do you give your photos to a 2nd editor? I believe its even a separate license for this feature.

Adobe pushed its cloud into our throats. What a terrible tactic to extract more money from users by making them pay for useless features. I chose not to upgrade to the latest C1 version, mainly because the massive price hike even for the Sony version. With this, I will keep in C1 until it works.

The pricing above for C1 makes sense if you are a business user. If not, it’s hopelessly high. That’s presumably by design. What does this mean for the brand-specific Express free versions of Capture One? Will there still be an Express? But they have recently removed some functionality. When I installed C1 Fujifilm Express last sping, you could sharpen in the export window.

Now no such thing, need to open the exported images in other software to sharpen them. I mean, I just buy a new version whenever it has features I actually want whenever they run a good enough upgrade deal. The nice thing about C1 is subscription is an option, not a requirement. I’m on C1 11 still. For me the most probable reason to upgrade would be if my new camera was not supported by C Luckily for me I haven’t bought a new digital camera in a long while ;.

Otherwise each new version brings in some new nice to have features, but nothing that would be groundbreaking. Apples vs Oranges, but if Adobe sees that the C1 pricing-model is working, there might be someone with a calculator at Adobe suggesting a pricehike on Adobe subscriptions also.

Capture One pricing is a mess and all over the place with different pricing options at different times for the same thing. Their product is getting very expensive compared to Adobe’s photo plan; if Capture One gets much more costly, I think they’ll start to bleed customers to Adobe. I’ve seen this a lot over the years with shareware software developers, with all different classes of functionality, terms and activation hoops.

QImage is a bit like that but looks to be getting better. Carbon Copy Cloner gets it. I agree with SC – CO’s pricing strategy indeed is a mess. Way too many options, way too many different rebates at different times and always with a different percentage off, as if they keep on looking for the optimal price point. That’s what I do. And this is CO’s biggest problem I think. They are slow to add features. When you have problems and need support CO acts arrogant like with the new HDR and Panorama function and the price of the software is already hefty and getting higher.

But for that you get a better interface, more customization options, and up to a few month ago you got added layers and masks. But that feature is now mostly in LR too. To be honest, I think Adobe licensing model for “Photography plan” is value for money.

Considering you are also getting photoshop. But saying that, I think to agree it’s probably due for a price hike soon. While it boasted quite a few advanced features, it was accompanied by a hefty price tag. DJI has pared down this offering a bit with their latest subg release, the Mini 3.

Is it worth the investment? It’s powered by the same impressive tech that guides self-driving vehicles and can detect and avoid obstacles from every angle. Can it overcome a lackluster camera to win hearts and minds? Every year, DJI releases a new consumer-grade smartphone gimbal. The Osmo Mobile 6 is the latest model in the series. Is it good enough to enhance your videos and photos?

Today they’ve released their Classic, a less expensive single-camera sibling. Who’s it for and is it a worthy addition to the Mavic family? We’ve combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.

These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We’ve selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. What’s the best camera for shooting sports and action?

Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we’ve rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.

The Orion spacecraft will be landing off the coast of Baja California this weekend. On December 5, Orion’s 20th day in space, the spacecraft performed its longest engine burn and captured some of its best photos of the moon. The new lenses remain essentially unchanged from their Sony E-mount and L-mount siblings, which were released earlier this year.

Watch as photographer Markus Hofstaetter restores a year-old Century No. Apple has announced it intends to release advanced security features to protect various data stored on iCloud, including photos. The new photo protection adds full end-to-end encryption for users’ saved images, provided they opt-in to the new Advanced Data Protection option. Creativity comes in ebbs and flows. Recognize your pattern, kill your ego and embrace what you don’t know to improve your skills, fast, and remain a lifelong learner.

Chinese smartphone maker Tecno has announced a new flagship smartphone at an event in Dubai. The Phantom X2 Pro includes a triple-camera rear array featuring a retractable smartphone camera with a 50MP sensor and 2.

Photographer Benedek Lampert took a massive LEGO Eiffel Tower into downtown Budapest to capture a nighttime photograph that made the replica tower look almost as real as its much larger, more metallic Parisian predecessor. Perpetual license owners will receive bug fixes until the next major release, but new the features and functionality you get at launch is what you have to work with going forward.

Chris and Jordan recently spent a delightful afternoon sharing their list of the year’s best and worst camera gear. Now that their hangovers have worn off, they’ve prepared a more sober reflection on their choices.

Pixelmator 3. The new features include brand-new video editing tools and support for additional motion-based designs and file formats. The winners of the International Landscape Photo of the Year awards have been announced, showcasing stunning natural beauty from around the world.

The Loupedeck Live S is now available following a successful crowdfunding campaign. The new editing console is Loupedeck’s most affordable and compact product, making it a great choice for beginners or photographers on-the-go. As someone who came of age in the digital world, I never thought I’d be a fan of film photography. One film class in high school, however, changed my outlook on the analog art form. The latest iteration of ON1 Software’s flagship Raw editor is jam-packed with AI smarts that aim to lighten your workload by taking subjects into account when making selections, applying presets, keywording and more.

Find out if it’s right for you in our review! Landscape pro Erez Marom takes a look at how to best achieve a sense of depth in landscape photographs. It’s that magical time of the year when Chris and Jordan look back on the year’s best and worst releases of photo and video gear. Tradition dictates a drinking game, and this year it’s a doozy Film photography is continuing its revival. New films are being announced, new cameras are being unveiled and we’ve rounded up a collection of film photography items you might want to consider getting over the holidays.

Portrait photographer Markus Hofstaetter knows a thing or two about capturing eyes of subjects. For his latest project, however, he takes eyes to the extreme with super-close-up macro photos of irises, showing eyes in a new, alien-like light.

When it comes to workflow, organization, and archiving years of accumulated photos and videos, everyone has their own system. DPReview’s Jason Hendardy highlights a few items that have worked for him throughout the years, while also asking our community to share their approaches and what’s been working for them. Shotkit surveyed 1, amateur and professional photographers to see what cameras they used for professional and personal work. The results were interesting in more ways than one.

For many film photographers, a light meter is a critical part of their kit. The second-generation manual prime lens features an updated optical design and a new square lens hood. Reading mode: Light Dark. Login Register. Best cameras and lenses. Now reading: Capture One ends its brand-specific versions for Fujifilm, Nikon and Sony cameras comments. Tags: capture-one , fujifilm , nikon , software , software-news , sony.

View Comments Comments All Thejoeborg This is all really confusing. Barleyman I had no idea it was so pricey. I’ll stay with Creative Cloud. Michael Berg Yes – I tried it. After using it for a while I went back to C1. But again, both apps are good with their pros and cons. Pixel They want to drive customers toward subscriptions. I am really missing the long term strategy. This whole thing gives me a bad feeling. Michael Berg The paragraph specifically identifies “brand new users” who will indeed have to pay more for the generic version.

Not that difficult to understand. Gulielmus Yeah, I misread. Eric Hensel The express versions are so heavily gelded, that everything good about C1 is left out. Francis85 Are you the referee going to decide what people actually need or not need?

BrightTiger Not being mean – just a critique on the recommendation. Djehuty Lol their lower price for older version upgrade is still expensive.

FTOG Believe what you will. BrightTiger “at this stage”.. Are you sure it’s going to work? Has anyone tried? Bob Janes Express versions continue in their current form.

Puppy Sluggish? Bob Janes.. BrightTiger The problem is hardware camera, computer, etc and every other software keeps evolving and requires greater performance. Michael Berg Not unsupported. You get at least a years worth of bug fixes after a new version comes out.

Bob Janes A perpetual licence gives the freedom to not pay for improvements until you need them. Chris Dubea We need to dispel this myth of a years support. I bought C1 v12 mid year, so effectively I got 6 months of support. When I upgraded it was literally on intro day. Terrible Photographer Good. It diluted the brand IMO. Roger C Definitely understandable. The quality of the noise reduction is determined by other factors not the origin of Capture One.

Sourov Thanks for clarifying. My apologies for the error. Looks like I am not really up to date. Terrible Photographer That’s because of the crowd. Nicolaso Terrible Photographer: I couldn’t agree more! Nicolaso JACS: definitely yes. Terrible Photographer amd I’ve had skin in the game for 15 years. Pixel A few weeks ago, I just paid for the cross update from Fuji to Pro Did anybody try to get a refund. Francis85 Though understandably – Good luck with that. Rootbeer Man Poor. Greg Silver I always thought it was weird to offer all these different versions for different camera manufacturers.

I use topaz and DXO on the side for specific tasks. I will not be upgrading again as cannot see the the value with the price increase. EMs This is imho the wrong way! I fear that it is the way to the end of Capture One.

Unfortunately also too little new with the before and last upgrade for the high price. Too bad, but I will not support this strategy anymore! I’m reasonably hopeful there’ll be better deals than the one currently available. ProfHankD It’s hard to make a profit selling software, even as subscriptions. ProfHankD Not really a common model MyReality The illogic and contradiction of some photographers is puzzling.

Lan I’m not averse to subscriptions in general, but their monthly subscription price seems out of touch with reality. Extremely impressed with it. The move was a long time coming on these branded versions.

Except a missing Linux native version :D. FTOG The brand specific versions were always a bit of a market outlier. For the customer, obviously, a discounted single-brand license now becomes unavailable. MikeRan Yep. MikeRan The annual upgrade costs have gotten out of hand.

My money went to DXO for Photolab this year. Impulses Hmm, how’s the pano stitching? Francis85 I can only confirm with Panther fan here. Francis85 LOL. BrentSchumer Just never buy newly released cameras and lenses. C1 can use RAW embedded profiles. BrentSchumer Is there a way to default a particular lens to the embedded profile? QuietOC Report it. TFranic Not true. Francis85 You never owned another camerabrand before? Dave Oddie First digital camera was a Minolta A1.

Francis85 That’s fair. Why am I not surprised? Francis85 Its a single feature that most of us don’t need. Mikho Yap. Justin-Case The pricing above for C1 makes sense if you are a business user. David Fleetwood I mean, I just buy a new version whenever it has features I actually want whenever they run a good enough upgrade deal.

Luckily for me I haven’t bought a new digital camera in a long while ; Otherwise each new version brings in some new nice to have features, but nothing that would be groundbreaking. Gesture And we thought Adobe was pricey. Hanging on to my Capture Free for Sony with dear life. Will be interesting to see the result of this gamble early next year.

Sc Capture One pricing is a mess and all over the place with different pricing options at different times for the same thing.

Gesture I’ve seen this a lot over the years with shareware software developers, with all different classes of functionality, terms and activation hoops. There will be a price hike, not if, but when for adobe. For hobbyists that don’t want to pay, time to look for a open source software. CO is cutting into their own fingers imho.

Francis85 That’s what I do. You may also like. Capture One says perpetual licenses will no longer include new features, functionality after purchase.

Latest sample galleries. DJI Mini 3 sample gallery. Nikon Z30 Sample Gallery. Canon RF mm F1. See more galleries ». Latest in-depth reviews. Read more reviews ».

Latest buying guides. Best cameras for videographers in The best cameras for family and friends photos in Best affordable cameras for sports and action in Check out more buying guides ».

Sigma mm F2. Discover more challenges ». Dec 9, Dec 9, 37 lens news. Film Friday: Watch as a photographer meticulously restores a year-old camera. Dec 9, 34 review. Apple introduces advanced security features, including end-to-end encryption for iCloud photos.

Dec 8, One Thing: Becoming a lifelong learner. Tecno unveils Phantom X2 Pro smartphone with retractable portrait lens. Dec 7, Dec 6, Dec 5, Loupedeck Live S editing console now available: A compelling option for the photographer on-the-go.

One Thing: How my first and only photography class made me fall in love with film. Dec 5, 34 review. Landscape Composition – Part 6: Depth. Dec 3, Dec 3, video. Dec 2, It also has a pared-down feature set , lacking many more pro-oriented editing, capture, organization and export tools that are available in the full version of Capture One.

But it still includes the basic tools most photographers are likely to need. But Adobe’s apps will support Raw files from close to different cameras, smartphones, drones and more, and you’ll also get the combined feature-set of Lightroom, Lightroom Classic and Photoshop, which together can do far more than even the full version of Capture One. Another advantage typical of manufacturer software is quicker and more in-depth support for new camera models, as well as a closer match for the look of images processed in-camera.

But with Capture One actually being developed by a third party, that’s not necessarily as true as it is for most manufacturer software.

It’s worth noting, for example, that Fujifilm has a long relationship with the developer of Silkypix. Support for those cameras in Capture One arrived on the same day both models shipped, however. So perhaps the link with Capture One is closer, or the Capture One team is just quicker bearing in mind that neither the X-E4 nor GFX S uses a new sensor, which theoretically makes adding support a relatively trivial matter.

As for the look of images, Fujifilm promises it will deliver ” unmatched straight-from-camera color accuracy “. But as we’ll see in a bit, that doesn’t tell the whole story. Capture One Express Fujifilm has a clean, modern-looking non-modal interface with a fixed toolbar at the top of the screen, as well as panels for both thumbnail browsing and all other tools.

The tool panel can be place on the left or the right, and the thumbnail panel either at the bottom of the screen or on whichever side remains unoccupied by the tool panel. Atop the tool panel are buttons to access tabs grouping controls related to library control, filtering, metadata and keywording, and various groups of editing controls.

There’s also a “Q” button that groups together duplicates of the controls you’re likely to need most often. While you can’t add or remove tabs or individual controls in the Express version, you can still pin your favorites to the top of their particular tab for quicker access. You can also add more tools to the topmost toolbar, or rearrange its order. I found the various controls on offer to be quite logically grouped and named, and easy to use.

Windows UI paradigms are followed well, and you can either adjust sliders or type in values directly. One very slight bug, though, is that the sliders seem to be stored internally with a higher level of precision than numeric entry, with the result that two images with the same numeric value can nevertheless show slightly different positions for the same slider. Your editing data is stored in an overall catalog file encompassing all of your imported images, and can also be written to XMP sidecar files in the same directories as the images themselves.

This lets you choose which approach you prefer, while avoiding the riskier method of writing edits into the metadata of your original Raw files. One slight oddity if you also use Photoshop in your workflow is that Capture One also embeds editing metadata into its exported JPEG files, with the result that by default Photoshop opens them in Camera Raw, not directly into the main Photoshop workspace. Multiple monitors aren’t supported in the Express version of Capture One, but high DPI screens are supported, as are both pen and touch-screen inputs.

Setups with mixed-resolution displays can cause scaling issues, however. Compared to most free, bundled software, Capture One Express turns in a very creditable result when it comes to performance.

It still doesn’t manage to match Adobe Camera Raw in this respect — and Adobe has made another step forward in the time I’ve been writing this review — but it comes closer than has any other app I’ve yet tested. In terms of its user interface, I found Capture One to be faster at browsing full images, while Adobe Camera Raw is a bit quicker when it came to viewing and previewing of edits.

But the advantage for Adobe was only very slight here, and Capture One’s edit previews remain very close to real-time. The first time it’s started — and again when updated — it pops up a dialog stating that it’s “setting up hardware acceleration”. Your computer remains responsive during this process, but until completed, it more than doubles rendering times.

And even leaving the computer entirely idle doesn’t persuade Capture One to speed up. It’s a minor issue, and one you thankfully don’t see too often, but it’s nevertheless a bit annoying if you’re in a rush when you do. I suggest disallowing upgrades if you’re on a deadline, for that reason. When it comes to final processing, Adobe has a bit more of an edge. On my machine, Capture One Express Fujifilm requires roughly 20 seconds to process the six images used in this review, as compared to around 15 seconds to process the same images in Adobe Camera Raw.

That doesn’t quite tell the whole story, though, as Adobe’s performance improved noticeably between version By way of contrast, most manufacturer software I’ve tested takes at least twice as long as Adobe, and sometimes much longer. In terms of their color rendering, both Capture One Express Fujifilm and Adobe Camera Raw are basically indistinguishable from each other or out-of-camera JPEGs, prior to making any adjustments to your image. At least, for the Astia, Provia and Velvia film simulations.

With that said, results differ quite a bit if you let either application automatically adjust your images. Adobe gives you a single-button auto control, and tends to make bigger adjustments to exposure. It holds onto shadows and highlights significantly better, but also tends to oversaturate for a more consumer-friendly look. Its auto white balance tends to do a better job, and its other auto algorithms also tended to yield more realistic colors in general than did Adobe.

I found that last point especially true for skin tones, foliage and blue skies. As you can see in my examples, Adobe’s skin tones has tended to make subjects look just slightly sickly, whereas Capture One’s skin tones are more lifelike. And there was a similar advantage in foliage and skies, which also look more natural with Capture One. Adobe’s algorithms also apply more sharpening by default, but can introduce slight but noticeable haloing.

Capture One doesn’t halo by default, but its results appear less crisp. Capture One’s default noise reduction levels are also a good bit higher than those of Adobe Camera Raw, particularly as ISO levels increase. The good news, though, is that I couldn’t see any noticeable loss of detail as a result. With absolutely no fuss beyond letting the automatic algorithms do their thing, Capture One consistently gave me significantly cleaner images.

Given the smaller APS-C sensors still used by Fuji’s X-mount cameras in an increasingly full-frame world, that’s definitely great news! Of course, both applications also allow noise reduction to be dialed back significantly from their defaults. As for lens corrections, neither application’s results was quite identical to those of in-camera JPEGs, but Adobe seems significantly closer than Capture One. Results from the latter were mostly still fairly close, but occasionally differed quite noticeably.

That was also true of vignetting correction, where Capture One sometimes made rather larger exposure corrections near the corners than did either Adobe or in-camera JPEGs. Capture One also has an occasional tendency to crop images if distortion correction was enabled, even when its “hide distorted areas” setting was unchecked. With all of that said, both Adobe Camera Raw and Capture One offer a lot of scope for correction, and provide a good set of controls.

I’ve found Capture One to be a pretty good match for its Adobe rival, and it’s far more pleasing to use than any other free, manufacturer-provided software to date, making it quite easy to get the look I wanted with relatively little work. I have to admit, the results of my testing were a bit of a surprise. Given the relationship between Capture One and Fujifilm, and the fact that the latter actually offers the software for its own users, I expected its results to more closely mirror those of in-camera processing.

But in truth, it was generally Adobe that got closer to the in-camera results. Capture One suppresses noise much more so than Adobe does by default, but without losing any apparent detail.

Colors from Adobe were generally good and matched the out-of-camera JPEGs better, but occasionally inn my testing I found that skin tones could make people look a bit ill. When it comes to the selection of controls on offer and their ease of use, both ACR and Capture One are pretty close.

Some other differences are in their distortion correction and auto adjustments. For distortion I think Adobe has a slight edge, but for auto adjustments I definitely ended up preferring Capture One over ACR’s more punchy, consumer-friendly look.

I was also impressed with Capture One’s performance. Sure, Adobe still rules the roost in this respect — and its most recent update looks to have taken another step forward — but it’s also payware software being pitted against a completely free alternative.

And Capture One gets far, far closer in terms of raw speed than any other bundled software I’ve yet tried. If cost is a primary concern for you and you don’t need to work with multiple camera brands, then I think it’s a no-brainer. Using Capture One Express Fujifilm could save you enough over the lifetime of your camera to buy a lens or accessory while still providing good speed, good image quality and a healthy selection of controls. If you want the maximum possible performance, support for multiple camera brands or the extended features offered by Lightroom or Photoshop, though, then I think an Adobe Creative Cloud subscription remains your best bet.

Images for this article were originally posted in this gallery. Please do not reproduce any of these images without prior permission see our copyright page. C1 had excellent customer survive in my experience, I think that is worth talking about in a review like this. C1 seems to make lighter images which should not matter as it will be adjusted manually anyway , but geometric lens correction seem bad in C1 – images BULGE compared to LR. Maybe lens profiles function was not set correctly?

Performance comparison was not very clearly presented; which one was more responsive? Final render speed does not matter much compared to UI performance. I’m fed up with Adobe’s bloated offering and hogging of my PC’s resources. It took close to an hour to uninstall the Adobe crap on my pc and to be sure I was rid of it I used a registry cleaner to take care of the rest. I mostly agree with the reviewer. But before that the only let down from C1 is mostly related to lens corrections.

Only missing local corrections from C1 express, but it is free and way better than Fujifilm X Raw Studio. BTW, comparing default settings in test does not make sens – it says nothing what each program can do.

Please enlighten us about the original colors you saw when the photos were taken. How do you know it isn’t the Adobe product that shifts colors? It would be nice to see Darktable covered. It is not a manufacturer-provided software but neither is Capture One Express. I liked the attention to detail in your article, but was surprised to see no mentioning of local adjustments.

I understand Capture One Express, unlike the full “Pro” version, does not support local adjustment, which is a major downside in my view. I’m also wondering whether LR managed to provide good X-trans support. It had issues at finest detail level in the past whereas C1 was praised in that regard. There could also be a mention of all the extra features LR offers even beyond what the full Capture One “Pro” version offers. Having said that, I find a choice between either the free “Express” version and the paid LR a bit artificial.

Before choosing LR, I’d advice anyone to have a good look at the C1 “Pro” version which offers comprehensive UI configurability and some very nice features like the “Skin Tone” tool. Elsewhere I also find Adobe rendition more natural with the exception of the giant teapot example where Capture One is more natural. My preference is not to emulate in camera jpgs but to have a more natural starting point for edits so on that score Adobe comes out top most of the time.

DNG converter is free It’s the same download for the free express or pro version for Fuji, Nikon and Sony. You just have to choose during installation what you want. You can always check the correct upgrade price from your express to the unlimited fuji, Sony or Nikon version from your capture one account. The pro version for all camera makes is the most expensive. The cheaper unlimited function versions for Nikon, fuji and Sony are the same, but just limited to this specific camera manufacturer.

Note that the installer file contains all Capture One product variants. However, you will need a license key to activate any of those starting from Capture One To get the license key for activating days fully-featured Capture One trial or Capture One Express, proceed with the links below. I prefer the C1E default look and the appearance of the highlights which as you note have more contrast.

Excepting the excessive default noise reduction C1E applies. This was all screen output? Although I appreciate these are Raw conversions, I would be curious as to how the printed output would appear. I just organize in Bridge and work in sessions. I don’t keep images that aren’t print worthy. I don’t see the problem.

It is best to import and move folders using LR because the catalogue needs to know where the files are. Outside of that you can use any other developer you like and it won’t effect LR edits. If you are going to move folders around what is the difference between using the OS or LR.

Same amount of steps. I wish Capture 1’s catalog system was better. Wish dxo photolab, and all the manufacturers software had good catalogs. Could just be habit. I’ve been using LR from the beginning. It’s fast and easy for me. As is working on images.

I’ve tried several different software solutions, capture one, DXO, aperture, and all the software that comes with my cameras.

I’ve tried to stick with one that was easiest for me and learn it best as I could. I still use the others sometimes to take a look at results. I almost always come back to what I know best. For basic edits, The free C1 option is worth looking into. Of course if you’re an Adobe user looking to dump your subscription, the learning curve is a bit higher, but easier than starting from scratch.

It can be limited though, but maybe pairing it with something like Affinity might be a good combo. I often saw the “free” or Express versions as very basic, for basic adjustments — exposure, highlights, shadows, etc, and sharpening and cropping but lacking some of the more advanced options like some local adjustments. So there’s a trade-off. Darktable is completely free, has no feature limitations, a plethora of tutorials on YouTube, works with downloadable LUTs for example Fuji film simulations, but also a huge number of others, as it supports multiple common file types , styles, and plugins for example for blending , and supports both advanced and beginner-friendly workflows.

You just have to set it up. You can apply customised settings at importing in C1, please note I have the paid version, not sure if this apply to the free version. This is the reason for the decreased detail Mike notices in the higher ISO comparisons.

I use Passport profiles for all my lenses and bodies If there is please let me know how. I know C1 has pre figured profiles, but they are not my camera and lens combos. I recently got the datacolor eqivalent, but do not understand how they are supposed to work yet.

It creates XMP files which would seem to me to not be the same. There does appear to be some trade-offs in doing so, but not always in Adobe’s favor. On the whole, manufacturer’s software is pretty darned good, especially for free.

This isn’t “mfr” software though. It’s just an alternative to the other paid options. However, if you work with other people collaborate Adobe might be a better choice as it’s more widely used. It’s “manufacturer offered software” and it’s free for use with specific cameras. It, along the others software tested so far, is a viable option for many people.

It won’t be viable for ALL however. Here, we have worms capturing the buildings and almost every flat surface on them I feel like in my tests worms went away awith simple adjustment to sharpening.

I use Phocus for conversion for prints C1 Express is free basic RAW editor. And also has some features better than paid LR. For example you have Levels and much more usable curves! HSL is also much better, you can edit color range. Histogram is more usable also. WB is usual better as noted in the review more natural and selectable auto adjustments. Sharpening is good and you have few algorithms for clarity. And basically you get much better starting point for Sony or Fuji! And this is almost for free.

This is much better solution for hobby or low budged PRO usage. Compared to any kind of subscription products even own C1 PRO. You can chain C1 Express to some free pixel editors like gimp also. I really love Capture One the Pro version for editing my Fuji files.

But I don’t understand why they don’t give us a panorama feature like lightroom does. That’s so important! The Nikon RAW files look so oversaturated and colors are just completely off. That means I have to either try a new editing software or switch back to Lightroom. Or did they improve that in version 21?

Even after it was requested by many people since around 9 years. And last year like real joke they dropped some kind of advanced color replacement as revolutionary local HSL tool Also Adobe AI adjustments and selection tools are poorest in the industry. And this is after many topics in the news for their big advancements and achievements in the filed of image editing and AI. Also could not understand praise about LR Classic interface.

This is the most obsolete and not ergonomic interface for work with mouse in any image editing product. If you want to make precise adjustments with mouse you can go crazy chasing after this small tinny sliders.

Not to mention PS interface and all over the place effects, filters and adjustments Only really good thing with Adobe is documentation to say something good Also no focus stacking. So they have just panorama and HDR stacking which is far away from ultimate stacking features. For all else you will need PS. Video-vs-photo which software do you use for stacking or panorama? I agree with you when it comes to LR interface. The sliders are just too small, it’s so much more comfortable in Capture One Layers are also great there.

Still evaluating, do not have favorite for now. There might still be the spot removal, but local tonal corrections and local sharpening are very important too. If you need all features you can get PRO which has muuuuch better local adjustments compared to the very basic one in LR!

Or you can just chain it with other pixel editor for local adjustments. Video-vs-Photo Agreed! This software allows for good raw development and OK basic photo-management. It is not designed to stop you from buying CaptureOne, proper.

It works fine as a raw developer with output exported to a bit mapped editor of your choice! Capture One Express Fujifilm”. All of them add and remove some features. And there is no free version either. Are you afraid to say Lightroom is not quite there when it comes to professional editing? I use the full Capture One.

The huge advantage for Fuji is the presence of the camera profiles. All the film simulations etc seem to be copied to Capture One. If the free version has these profiles that may be beneficial. New versions of Capture One added Pro profiles for cameras. Those seem to render skies much better. Timely article, thank you. I’m about to get a X-E4 and have LR6. I’ve tried the demo of Iridient, seems ok not great.

My question is, on Capture One express, can you save yr edits a Tiff files so I can edit in other software without losing data? Cheers if u can help. Now it is a little bit of an over exaggeration, but Capture One Express is like a demo of what you can do with Capture One.

It definitely does not give you a full experience of what you can do with it and most of the useful functions have been taken out of this basic ‘free’ version. Capture One Expres is a good way to see if it fits your way of working and to see if you like its color rendering, but don’t expect too much of it.

It definitely is not a replacement for your Lightroom, nor is it actually a reference to what you can truly achieve with Capture One. I would say both apps have their own pros and cons and don’t forget you get Photoshop for free with you Adobe subscription. That said I do like Capture One Pro better. I use the pro version and suppose the free one is similar in this regard. You can select to edit in external program and it exports the file with all edits to TIFF that is then opened by Photoshop.

You can select 16 bit color, AdobeRGB color space etc. You can export in whatever format you like. And yes this is free basic RAW editor. Thanks guys. Think i was hoping for a tiny bit more. I am trying out Capture One Express Fujifilm again. My last time was in , and I immediately deleted it because I am allergic to library and catalog stuff. Surprise, the new install opens up with OK, just found out how to get rid of it. And, by the way it is tuning hardware acceleration with an estimated time of 60 minutes Me too, I just hate this “library and catalog stuff”, I much prefer to arrange my files by myself.

The full version has session option that does not import photos into database and uses sidecar files instead. The article mentions that sidecars are available. So you should be able to work without Catalogue. Kiril – I have not found a Session option in Express so far.

I only see “Import Session I just found this on CaptureOne site. You may give it a try. It uses XMP files. So may be quite useful. About Capture One’s con’s You’re kidding right? There’s good reason you won’t find any Digital Tech’s with any experience using Lightroom:. You can move the browser to any side, top or bottom, re arrange the toolbar and even what’s in it, change every single keystroke, or have the entire interface in floating windows This is one of the main reasons to use C1!

I run up to 5 monitors at a time on set. Again, I don’t know what this guy was doing wrong. CO Express versions are feature limited. However, the interesting thing is that all of the images in the gallery use ACR – not one of them show CO Express output. I can never export my files to any other format none in Capture One.

It’s useless. I have a Fujifilm express license and subscription. Any help would be appreciated. Have you looked at process recipes? You sound as if you are in “Adobe mode” – you need to break out from expecting everything to operate like Adobe. Thank heavens. Can’t imagine how you would navigate different video editing programs if simple photo editing ones give you trouble.

This is well documented, but it’s evidently not even on the radar for rectification at C1. It’s amazingly easy to corrupt a catalog, and then you better hope you have a recent backup that didn’t have issues. The plus of the full version is you can work in Sessions, which is better behaved.

When doing so, the sidecar text files are automatically created and can be archived. C1 does not write development settings to xmp files. C1 writes nothing to xmp files.

It will read ratings and colors from them but not write them. Nor will it write anything directly to jpg files. You can export jpg files with metadata, but not save metadata to the original jpg’s. Saying all that, C1 Express is an excellent tool for raw development particularly of Fuji raw files.

So much so, that I bought the full blown version. Development settings can be exported as text sidecar files for arrival purposes. This is not the same as a direct save. Love the imagery, catalogs, not so much. On a Windows box, keep your image count in your catalogs below 30k. If not, things get really weird and slow.

CO explicitly states that all adjustments are held in the catalogue or session folders. I have had a catalogue get corrupted a few times, but then I have backups written to off device storage media. At least I can get back to where I was before the system ate it self. Not all that difficult to recover from if you practice safe computing processes. In the unthinkable event one would want to move from C1 to another app, how does one migrate metadata? In the open source software options I found RawTherapee easier to use than Darktable.

Though I am sure Darktable works well if you can fathom the workflows available, but I spent equal time with each. With Capture One Express existing for Nikon and Sony as well its a pretty good program to standardize on without having a constant tax on your hobby, you don’t really have to relearn anything.

Though of course express versions could go away at some point. Forgot to mention that Capture One has adjustment layers and Quick Edit keys. The objective here isn’t to run down every feature available in both programs, which would lead to an extremely long article for a program as in-depth as Capture One.

It’s to show the basics and give a sense of which program makes it easier to get the results you’re after from those basics. Adjustment layers aren’t available in the version he is describing, it is available in the paid version. Isn’t that’s a Photoshop bug? They could easily parse the XMP and open into ACR only those that have Adobe’s namespace edits included, with the rest going into main PS interface – controllable in preferences I presume C1 writes its edits under its own namespace.

You should really brush up on XMP :. Though the bug can be useful at times, as I could easily soft-crop hundreds of photos in Photomechanic before opening them in ACR with the crop preserved in the same amount of time I might crop ten at most in ACR itself. Cropping in ACR is the last step in the rendering pipeline, so it was extremely slow if you had vignetting and distortion and local corrections on another long known bug or “feature” , since it was rendering all of these as you were adjusting the crop.

If the raw images are accessible I can display incomparably better results out of C1. It is all about experience and habit. As a long-term C1 user is see lots of space for improvement in the versions posted in this article.

As noted early on, the goal for the samples isn’t to get the best-processed image, per se, as that’s more subjective and doesn’t tell me as much comparitively. The objective was to get as close as I could to the same finishing point with both applications, with that finishing point being an already-extant processed image from our galleries, and without any prior knowledge as to the recipe used to create that image.

Here we go with the “incomparable, Earth shattering, mind blowing epoch making superiority” of Capture One. Mike that objective is quite unclear and far from a good starting point. You should compare the best that the two products offer, rarely one tries to get something else but the best out of his images.

Fuji is my primary camera system, and I must admit I went looking for a different processor than ACR at first Iridient did a better job, after playing with the adjustments. However, one can’t send the processed image as anything other than a jpg, and I’ve heard that the catalog isn’t good enough to be a DAM, especially when compared to LR Classic.

With the resent changes in ACR, I now use that program almost exclusively. I should add that Mike Tompkins got it right when he stated that Cap One for Fuji could be all a Fuji user needs, even with it’s downsides. How can this be a proper test if you don’t explore what the software can do for you? Massive timesaver. As alluded to, highlights are the slight time waster though. The software tends to throw away highlight detail but, annoyingly, by a different amount for every image, which means I have become very familiar with the highlight slider!

Colour reproduction is fabulous. That comment is referring to the samples in the piece. I tested them, just didn’t use them for the comparisons. I also discussed how much better Capture One was for noise reduction in the first place:. Yes, I read that but it’s still dealing with default settings. Also, it’s always up to date! I also noted that Capture One only gives you one license per email address for free.

Although it’s easy to get more simply by creating throwaway email addresses. Now CO has a subscription for CO Pro, but I am do not know if any functionality is removed if you stop the subscription. AND the ability to upload photos on the cloud syncing across all your devices. I have more than synced fotos, all available to play with anywhere I go. So that matters. Hardware is necessary! When option available and compelling i will choose the free one.

All the best for your photography in Sri Lanka! I’m happy with it and will get a perpetual Pro license at some point. Adobe lost my business after you know what, I don’t really care what they offer :.

Pretty much why i didn’t see a need to upgrade to the C1 v21 when it offers nothing much but ask for more money. What about a focus stacking in LR? Or maybe high res stacks or stacks for better NR, or stars? LR stack and stitching is far away the best so maybe better concentrate on RAW functionality instead of offering many half backed stuff.

I really like C1 style of doing what it does properly. I use the free for Sony version of C1. It will also convert DNG raw files from my Pentax bodies but won’t allow edits. I have used and continue to use several different PP software.